[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: >Amsterdam?

To: shirey@mitre.org (Robert W. Shirey)
Subject: Re: >Amsterdam?
From: Paul_Lambert@poncho.phx.sectel.mot.com (Paul Lambert)
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 1993 16:36:34 MST
Cc: ipsec@ans.net (ip security mailing list)

        Reply to:   RE>>Amsterdam?

>I don't see why there should not be normal, continuing meetings of the
>existing working groups in Amsterdam.  If there are not, then it is not an
>IETF and there is no point to all of us going.  If the reason is that
>people can't go just because it is overseas, that information needs to be
>give to the IESG.

Rob,

I agree, but currently only a fraction of all working groups have committed
themselves to meeting in Amsterdam.

If you are interested in which groups are currently planning to meet this
information was posted by Megan: 

>I have placed a draft agenda for Amsterdam in the remote 
>directories under 0mtg-agenda.ams.txt

I'm sure that after the Ohio meeting more groups will sign up for Amsterdam.

Paul

Prev by Date: FWD>IPSEC- IPSEC- March IET
Next by Date: IPSEC Reference Documents
Prev by thread: FWD>IPSEC- IPSEC- March IET
Next by thread: IPSEC Reference Documents
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread