[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Comments on Tuesday's meeting

To: Steve Kent <kent@BBN.COM>
Subject: Re: Comments on Tuesday's meeting
From: Robert Hagens <hagens@reston.ans.net>
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 93 14:07:50 EST
Cc: Ran Atkinson <atkinson@itd.nrl.navy.mil>, ipsec@ans.net
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 09 Nov 93 13:32:16 EST." <199311091831.AA04506@interlock.ans.net>


> Ran,
> 
> 	The protocol ID space is fairly small under IPv4, so I don't
> know if Jon will be willing to issue two IDs for this protocol.
> Having optional header fields to accommodate confidentiality vs.
> integrity/authenticity seems more reasonable.
> 
> Steve
It seems that the degree of security "confidentiality vs.
 integrity/authenticity" is an attribute of the security association. Thus,
could this be carried in the SAID ?

Rob

Follow-Ups:

Re: Comments on Tuesday's meeting

From: Steve Kent <kent@BBN.COM>

References:

Re: Comments on Tuesday's meeting

From: Steve Kent <kent@BBN.COM>

Prev by Date: Re: Comments on Tuesday's meeting
Next by Date: Re: Comments on Tuesday's meeting
Prev by thread: Re: Comments on Tuesday's meeting
Next by thread: Re: Comments on Tuesday's meeting
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread