Re: Emphasizing Key Mgmt

["Donald E. Eastlake 3rd (Beast)" <dee@skidrow.lkg.dec.com>]

Steve,

I'm not sure what the right thing to do is but I expect to be posting
a draft in connection with DNS security within a week which is quite
relevant to some forms of key management.

From:  Stephen D Crocker <crocker@tis.com>
To:  Paul_Lambert@poncho.phx.sectel.mot.com (Paul Lambert)
Cc:  atkinson@itd.nrl.navy.mil (Ran Atkinson),
            ipsec@ans.net (ip security mailing list)
In-Reply-To:  Your message of "Thu, 03 Feb 94 08:07:27 MST."
	                  <00112.2843107862.63903@poncho.phx.sectel.mot.com> 
>Should we keep key management as a work item and goal within IPSEC or
>consider some other arrangement?
>
>I'm open to starting a separate group to work on this.  However, it
>would obviously be a bit more complicated to have a distinct group
>working on key management.

I don't really see a need to multiply working groups yet.

>A third alternative (after leaving this as is or starting a fresh
>group) is to set up some sort of subgroup that's tied into IPSEC but
>organized to make progress in the near future.
>
>Comments?
>
>Steve

Donald

---

References:

• Emphasizing Key Mgmt
• From: Stephen D Crocker <crocker@tis.com>

---

• Prev by Date: Re: Emphasizing Key Mgmt
• Next by Date: Re: Emphasizing Key Mgmt
• Prev by thread: Emphasizing Key Mgmt
• Next by thread: Re: Emphasizing Key Mgmt
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread