[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: swIPe
Dean Jagels says:
> Pardon an intrusion from a lurker. May I suggest that this recent
> thread concerning swIPe has been beaten to death?
I believe that we had already gone past the mini-argument and were
moving on to discuss swIPe itself, which is certainly within the
group's charter.
Actually, at least part of the discussion has moved beyond swIPe, and on
to a more important question: what is it we want/need from a security
layer? What sorts of functionality should it provide? That applies at
least as much to key management as to the encryption layer per se.