[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SIPP and SKIP. 2 subjects.

To: ashar@firstperson.com (Ashar Aziz)
Subject: Re: SIPP and SKIP. 2 subjects.
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 1994 15:27:32 -0400
Cc: ipsec@ans.net
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 02 Aug 1994 11:21:25 PDT." <9408021821.AA09227@miraj.Eng.Sun.COM>
Reply-To: perry@imsi.com


Ashar Aziz says:
> The SAID is being used merely to determine the mode of processing,
> e.g confidentiality, integrity etc, and thereby types the information
> following the SAID.
> 
> My current encryption-only implementation of SKIP in fact has
> no SAID field.

How does your current implementation deal with the possibility of
different encryption algorithms being used at the same time? I noticed
you presenting performance figures for several differing algorithms --
DES, RC4, etc, so I assume you have such a provision.

Perry

References:

Re: SIPP and SKIP. 2 subjects.

From: ashar@firstperson.com (Ashar Aziz)

Prev by Date: Re: SIPP and SKIP. 2 subjects.
Next by Date: Re: Thoughts on a basic encryption mode
Prev by thread: Re: SIPP and SKIP. 2 subjects.
Next by thread: Re: SIPP and SKIP. 2 subjects.
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread