[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-sipp-ap-04.txt
Ran Atkinson says:
> In particular, performance issues remain with the use of keyed MD5.
> An untuned implementation of MD5 on a fast 64-bit commercial RISC
> processor only calculates at 20 Mbps; smaller and slower processors
> would not go so fast. This does not bode particularly well for
> networks using FDDI or other high-speed technologies. A commercially
> strong but less computationally expensive algorithm would be more
> desirable than MD5, IMHO. I don't know of any such algorithms --
> suggestions are solicited.
I know of none, either. SHA is actually likely slower. Tuned
implementations of MD5 would, of course, be interesting to play with.
Perry
References: