[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IVs and IDENTs

To: Phil Karn <karn@qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: IVs and IDENTs
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 1994 14:37:28 -0400
Cc: atkinson@itd.nrl.navy.mil, kasten@ftp.com, ipsec@ans.net
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 29 Aug 1994 10:27:07 PDT." <199408291727.KAA21198@servo.qualcomm.com>
Reply-To: perry@imsi.com


Phil Karn says:
> Yes, but the whole point to this exercise was to see if we could keep
> the overhead to a minimum.
> 
> I occasionally run an IPSEC prototype over my SLIP link. I can easily
> tell when it is there by the decreased performance. There is no VJ
> header compression and no V.42bis data compression.

I've been wondering if there isn't some way we could put in header
compression in such instances -- after all, the two ends of the
encrypting tunnel are effectively a point to point link.

.pm

Follow-Ups:

Re: IVs and IDENTs

From: Steve Kent <kent@BBN.COM>

Re: IVs and IDENTs

From: Phil Karn <karn@qualcomm.com>

References:

Re: IVs and IDENTs

From: Phil Karn <karn@qualcomm.com>

Prev by Date: Re: IVs and IDENTs
Next by Date: Re: IVs and IDENTs
Prev by thread: Re: IVs and IDENTs
Next by thread: Re: IVs and IDENTs
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread