[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IPsecv4 and IPsecv6

To: ipsec@ans.net
Subject: Re: IPsecv4 and IPsecv6
From: Ran Atkinson <atkinson@sundance.itd.nrl.navy.mil>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 1994 21:16:23 -0500
In-Reply-To: Phil Karn <karn@qualcomm.com> "Re: IVs, summary of discussion" (Aug 30, 17:28)
References: <199408310028.RAA28943@servo.qualcomm.com>
Reply-To: atkinson@itd.nrl.navy.mil
Sender: atkinson@sundance.itd.nrl.navy.mil


I think that it is completely unrealistic to think that a single
packet format will work well for both IPv4 and IPv6.  I don't think it
is important if the two bit formats differ somewhat.  I think it is
important that the the services provided and external hooks (e.g.  to
key management) be the same.  This is based on having a prototype IPv6
implementation that has been moving packets across an Ethernet since
July.

Ran
atkinson@itd.nrl.navy.mil

References:

Re: IVs, summary of discussion

From: Phil Karn <karn@qualcomm.com>

Prev by Date: Re: IVs, summary of discussion
Next by Date: IPSEC requirements
Prev by thread: Re: IVs, summary of discussion
Next by thread: Re: IVs, summary of discussion
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread