[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re[4]: IPSEC at Dec IETF

To: Paul_Lambert-P15452@email.mot.com
Subject: Re: Re[4]: IPSEC at Dec IETF
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 1994 13:15:00 -0500
Cc: ipsec@ans.net
In-Reply-To: Your message of "02 Dec 1994 11:03:00 CST." <M7793.001.73l70.1.941202180530Z.CC-MAIL*/OU=SECCG/OU=AZBH/PRMD=MOT/ADMD=MOT/C=US/@MHS>
Reply-To: perry@imsi.com


Paul_Lambert-P15452@email.mot.com says:
> >However, I think that at this point
> >everyone agrees that what we are going to be left with is virtually
> >indistinguishable from Ran's drafts ....
> 
> I do not fully agree.  It is true that the basic format was fairly
> well determined at the last meeting short of a few bytes here or
> there.  Beyond the format there are issue areas that need to be
> expanded in a document.  Error handling, management information,
> decryptor discovery, and multicast SAID usage are areas that now
> need description.  Hopefully putting the format issues to rest will
> allow the group to move forward on these other areas.

I fully agree that there are deficits in areas such as these in the
current documents that need repair, but I would rather have these
added on as supplements to a single set of documents or modifications
to those documents than end up with two sets. The IPng need to solve
all the same problems, and as with the formats it would be nice to
have just one set of defining documents.

Perry

References:

Re[4]: IPSEC at Dec IETF

From: Paul_Lambert-P15452@email.mot.com

Prev by Date: Re[4]: IPSEC at Dec IETF
Next by Date: IPSEC Agenda for Dec IETF
Prev by thread: Re[4]: IPSEC at Dec IETF
Next by thread: Internet Draft for Modular Key Management
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread