[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: WG last call for IPv4 AH and ESP

To: Dan Nessett <Danny.Nessett@eng.sun.com>, atkinson@itd.nrl.navy.mil
Subject: Re: WG last call for IPv4 AH and ESP
From: Ran Atkinson <rja@bodhi.itd.nrl.navy.mil>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 1995 15:43:02 -0500
Cc: ipsec@ans.net
In-Reply-To: Danny.Nessett@Eng.Sun.COM (Dan Nessett) "Re: WG last call for IPv4 AH and ESP" (Feb 22, 11:45)
References: <199502221945.LAA23054@elrond.Eng.Sun.COM>
Reply-To: atkinson@itd.nrl.navy.mil
Sender: rja@bodhi.itd.nrl.navy.mil

Dan,

  We disagree.

  Also, that does not introduce a dependence of routing
upon DNS.  It means that standard key mgmt depends on DNS.  This
is reasonable since DNS is required and if DNS is broken, then many
things won't work.

Ran

References:

Re: WG last call for IPv4 AH and ESP

From: Danny.Nessett@eng.sun.com (Dan Nessett)

Prev by Date: Re: WG last call for IPv4 AH and ESP
Next by Date: Speed of DH key exchange
Prev by thread: Re: WG last call for IPv4 AH and ESP
Next by thread: Re: WG last call for IPv4 AH and ESP
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread