[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: WG last call for IPv4 AH and ESP

To: Ashar Aziz <ashar@osmosys.incog.com>
Subject: Re: WG last call for IPv4 AH and ESP
From: Ran Atkinson <rja@bodhi.itd.nrl.navy.mil>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 1995 14:39:02 -0500
Cc: ipsec@ans.net
In-Reply-To: ashar@osmosys.incog.com (Ashar Aziz) "Re: WG last call for IPv4 AH and ESP" (Feb 23, 11:24)
References: <9502231924.AA07236@miraj.>
Reply-To: atkinson@itd.nrl.navy.mil
Sender: rja@bodhi.itd.nrl.navy.mil

Ashar,

  By modifying the AH and ESP to include support for your key management
method, it detracts from the independence of key management and
security protocol.  A modification to support one kind of in-band
key mgmt would not necessarily support all kinds of in-band key mgmt
and hence would not preserve independence of key mgmt and security
protocols.

Regards,

Ran
atkinson@itd.nrl.navy.mil

References:

Re: WG last call for IPv4 AH and ESP

From: ashar@osmosys.incog.com (Ashar Aziz)

Prev by Date: Re: "in-band" is wrong idea/terminology
Next by Date: I-D ACTION:draft-simpson-icmp-domain-name-00.txt
Prev by thread: Re: WG last call for IPv4 AH and ESP
Next by thread: Re: WG last call for IPv4 AH and ESP
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread