[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Auth Header Length

To: William Allen Simpson <Bill.Simpson@um.cc.umich.edu>, ipsec@ans.net
Subject: Re: Auth Header Length
From: Ran Atkinson <rja@bodhi.nrl.navy.mil>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 1995 10:16:31 -0500
In-Reply-To: "William Allen Simpson" <Bill.Simpson@um.cc.umich.edu> "Auth Header Length" (Mar 20, 9:55)
References: <199503201000.AA09364@interlock.ans.net>
Reply-To: atkinson@itd.nrl.navy.mil
Sender: rja@bodhi.cs.nrl.navy.mil

Bill,

  Your proposed change would not be consistent with the IPv6 practice
on location of header fields.  I believe the cost of inconsistency
is greater than the benefit of having it first.

Ran
atkinson@itd.nrl.navy.mil

References:

Auth Header Length

From: "William Allen Simpson" <Bill.Simpson@um.cc.umich.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: Comments on draft-metzger-ah-01.txt
Next by Date: Re: (IPng) Re: Proposed message on perfect forward security
Prev by thread: Auth Header Length
Next by thread: Intermediate SA - was Re[2]: Routing
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread