[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: MD5 versus SHA

To: bound@zk3.dec.com
Subject: Re: MD5 versus SHA
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 1995 10:13:51 -0500
Cc: ipsec@ans.net
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 29 Mar 1995 00:13:23 EST." <199503290516.AA40762@interlock.ans.net>
Reply-To: perry@imsi.com


bound@zk3.dec.com says:
> Speaking of prototypes.  How many folks out there could be ready for an
> interoperability test fest say July before Stockholm IETF with IPv6
> implementations (meaning your kernel can do Rans architecture)?

I'll be ready to interoperably test IPv4 with Phil by then I believe
(with his IPSP stuff -- NOT photuris unless I steal his code, which
would sort of obviate part of the exercise.)  I don't know about v6
people -- to my knowledge, thats Ran at this point.

.pm

References:

Re: MD5 versus SHA

From: bound@zk3.dec.com

Prev by Date: Re: A Modest Proposal
Next by Date: Re: A Modest Proposal
Prev by thread: Re: MD5 versus SHA
Next by thread: Re: MD5 versus SHA
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread