[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IPv6 Security Last Call Initial Questions

To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@MIT.EDU>
Subject: Re: IPv6 Security Last Call Initial Questions
From: bound@zk3.dec.com
Date: Sat, 01 Apr 95 09:31:39 -0500
Cc: bound@zk3.dec.com, perry@imsi.com, ipsec@ans.net
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 31 Mar 95 17:29:07 +0500." <9503312229.AA28718@dcl.MIT.EDU>

Ted,

>You seem to be the only one argueing for making DES optional....

Yes I am the only vocal one.  I assure you if this is not changed I will
not be only objection in a last call.  Am I championing this change. Yes.
If I am the only individual who works for a vendor who takes issue with
this I will be surprised.

If I loose this debate at the IESG level then at least its recorded and
I did my best to correct what I believe is a major mistake for the
industry.

But we have a lot to do with key mgmt and tightning up the specs and I
will not discuss this anymore on the mail list OK.  I think my position
is clear, whether I am the only one or not is irrelevant.  Community
consensus should not be the activity of the most active mail
participants and I believe fortuneately that is not the case.

/jim

Follow-Ups:

Re: IPv6 Security Last Call Initial Questions

From: " " <amir@watson.ibm.com>

Next by Date: Re: IPv6 Security Last Call Initial Questions (per user keying)
Next by thread: Re: IPv6 Security Last Call Initial Questions
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread