[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Comments on IPSO and AH/ESP

To: rja@bodhi.nrl.navy.mil
Subject: Re: Comments on IPSO and AH/ESP
From: Andy Bayerl <bayerl@zk3.dec.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 95 09:53:26 -0400
Cc: ipsec@ans.net
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 17 Aug 95 08:11:51 EDT." <199508171215.AA12541@interlock.ans.net>


   Ran Writes:

   Reality is that there are folks (primarily TSIG/CIPSO people and
   those who have been strongly influenced by them) who will continue
   using explicit labels.  

Being one of those *TSIG/CIPSO people*, it is MHO that in the IPv6
world we will use implicit labelling unless for some reason it proves to
be unworkable. I cannot speak for all TSIG vendors, but I believe that
our Digital MLS+ products would most certainly make every attempt
to use it.

References:

Re: Comments on IPSO and AH/ESP

From: Ran Atkinson <rja@bodhi.nrl.navy.mil>

Prev by Date: Re: Comments on IPSO and AH/ESP
Next by Date: Re: Comments on IPSO and AH/ESP
Prev by thread: Re: Comments on IPSO and AH/ESP
Next by thread: Re: Comments on IPSO and AH/ESP
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread