[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Photuirs & signature - protocol vs. algorithm
- To: ipsec@ans.net
- Subject: Photuirs & signature - protocol vs. algorithm
- From: "Juan A. Garay ((914) 784-6852)" <garay@watson.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Oct 95 12:12:33 EDT
Ran Atkinson writes:
> 4.
> It is true that the theoretical cryptography community and the
> computer networking community do not share the same meaning for the
> term "protocol". The former uses "protocol" in a way that the latter
> would generally use "algorithm". Neither group is wrong, but perhaps
> it is helpful to remind folks of this. I don't find flames on this
> matter to be constructive. We all need to try to cooperate and work
> together here. :-)
In a distributed, network environment, a protocol is (should be)
a collection of algorithms, one for each participant.
Cheers,
Juan
PS 'hope this comment doesn't place me (at least completely)
in the theoretician camp! :-)