[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Photuris // Variable-Precision numbers
> From: rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Ron Rivest)
> The problem is for the case t = 1. It is inconsistent to have no bits in the
> value field at all. For t=1, you should be able to represent either 0 or 1.
> Size Value Represents (decimal)
> 0000 0
What in the world is a number with _no_ significant bits?
> 0001 00 0 *** This is what you want
> 0001 01 1 *** This is what you want
What is the point of a number with 1 significant bit which is always 1?
My answer to these rhetorical questions is:
There is no such thing as a number with no significant bits. Therefore,
we steal that number to make programming simpler. 0 means a number with
one significant bit, which is 0.
Rather than wasting space on a number with 1 significant bit, when half
the possible values are already special cased, use the size field to
special case that 1, meaning 1 significant bit of value 1.
Oh, and this is all rather a waste of time arguing, since 0 and 1 aren't
legal for exponents anyway. They are just very commonly used numbers.
Never-the-less, I will try to make the wording clearer next time around.
I presume that you like the 'ff' extension scheme? Good, thanks for
the suggestion!
And since we are down to little quibbles, I presume that you are happy
with the fields hashed for the signature, session-keys, and others?
Are there any serious cryptographic flaws in the messages?
Bill.Simpson@um.cc.umich.edu
Key fingerprint = 2E 07 23 03 C5 62 70 D3 59 B1 4F 5E 1D C2 C1 A2