[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Nodes and Users
> From: smb@research.att.com
> Bill has expressed to me in private mail that he thinks that the
> question of certificates, certificate formats and naming can wait, but
> frankly I don't think it can because we don't have a usable system
> without it.
>
> I agree very strongly with Perry about this. I tried raising the
> issue a few months ago; it met with a resounding silence. We need
> to settle this immediately, if not sooner. It is, as far as I'm
> concerned, an absolute show-stopper -- without some resolution, I
> would vote against -- well, not precisely vote in the IETF, but you
> know what I mean -- Photuris, on those grounds alone.
>
I have responded to this thread several times. (The title is mine)
Very good, then I am sure that the Chairs will count this as opposing
Photuris submission as a Proposed Standard. If there is insufficient
support, I will submit it as Experimental instead. Thank you.
Bill.Simpson@um.cc.umich.edu
Key fingerprint = 2E 07 23 03 C5 62 70 D3 59 B1 4F 5E 1D C2 C1 A2