Re: naming and terminology

[Phil Karn <karn@qualcomm.com>]

>	As co-chair, my understanding of consensus is roughly what Ted
>T'so described -- namely the "mutually suspicious users" problem is
>one that MUST be addressed in pass 1.  I do NOT think this is hard to
>do -- if one simply supports PGP keys (which name users not systems)
>in Photuris and has the ability to pass the name string between the
>two parties to the Photuris exchange the basic requirement is met.  I

Ran, if that's all there is, then I have no problem with it at all.
I just didn't want an extended philosophical debate to stall work on the
basic mechanisms.

Phil

---

References:

• naming and terminology
• From: atkinson@itd.nrl.navy.mil (Ran Atkinson)

---

• Prev by Date: Re: Interop
• Next by Date: Re: SKIP: Interoperability proposal
• Prev by thread: naming and terminology
• Next by thread: Re: naming and terminology
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread