[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SPIs, etc.

To: Ran Atkinson <rja@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: SPIs, etc.
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 1995 22:09:16 -0500
Cc: ipsec@ans.net
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 12 Dec 1995 15:45:36 PST." <199512122345.AA05728@interlock.ans.net>
Reply-To: perry@piermont.com

Ran Atkinson writes:
>   My vague recollection of the NRL implementation is that it might NOT
> support having the same SPI for an AH session as for an ESP session
> for a given destination address.  I don't currently have access to the
> sources and I could be entirely mistaken on this.

Others have mentioned their systems have similar problems. I know you
can fix the NRL one, but I think it is harmless and probably better to
say that the name space is shared. If it isn't, ALL implementations
must support having split namespace, and that could be a problem.

Perry

References:

SPIs, etc.

From: Ran Atkinson <rja@cisco.com>

Prev by Date: SPIs, etc.
Next by Date: URLs
Prev by thread: SPIs, etc.
Next by thread: Re: SPIs, etc.
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread