[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ICMP Security Failures

To: Todd Graham Lewis <todd@wooster.org>
Subject: Re: ICMP Security Failures
From: cfm@columbia.sparta.com (Carl F. Muckenhirn)
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 1995 15:07:41 -0500
Cc: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@apollo.hp.com>, "PALAMBER.US.ORACLE.COM" <PALAMBER@us.oracle.com>, daw@cs.berkeley.edu, ipsec@ans.net

At 11:18 am 12/22/95, Todd Graham Lewis wrote:
>Attention: NSA start quoting here for my indictment:

    First, NSA doesn't indict anyone, that's up to the Atty. Gen.

>
>I am pretty sure that I already know what the answer would be, but what
>if some hypothetical individual were working on a freely-distributable
>Linux ESP implementation that, say, included _no_ implementations but was
>easily extensible?  I hate to clutter the list with politico-crypto-flame
>bait, but would this fall under the range of the "permissible"?
>
>Todd Graham Lewis
>todd@wooster.org
>


        Cryptographic interface software has historically been lumped in
with actual implementations vis a vis the ITARs.  If you are really
concerned consult an attorney.

carl.

Prev by Date: Re: ICMP Security Failures
Next by Date: Re: ICMP Security Failures
Prev by thread: Re: ICMP Security Failures
Next by thread: Re: ICMP Security Failures
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread