[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Censure of Mr. Simpson
Stephen Kent writes:
> The IETF relies on voulenteers to do the real work of standards
> production and Bill's offer to write a document contributing to that work
> is laudable. However, the work of this group has suffered from very poor
> documents in general and several members have cited Bill's documentation of
> Photuris as an example of specification that does not facilitate
> independent interoperable implementation. Your individual experience to
> the contrary, this complaint about Bill's writing still stands.
Are we angry with Bill for being rude, or are we angry with him
because he is a poor writer? I would hate to think that one could be
censured for being a poor writer. I will add, however, that in my
opinion Bill is a very good writer from an implementors perspective.
Perry
Follow-Ups:
References: