[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ADMIN: Straw Poll Results on Key Mgmt
At 01:44 PM 2/13/96 -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>
> Right now we have a number of differnet proposals on the table,
>none of which completely meet all of the original requirements.
>However, it wouldn't be that hard to fix this; it wouldn't be hard for
>SKIP to add PFS, or Photoris to add support for full Security
>Association attributes negotiation, etc. Instead of bickering around
>playing procedural games and raising meta-issues, if the various people
>who are proposing key management protocols to this wg simply sat down
>and did the work to meet all of the requirements as originally specified
>by this wg, we could be done in relatively short order. I really don't
>think it's all that hard for any of the proposals currently on the
>table.
Seconded. What is the Draft deadline? If any of these protocols are
serious, let's see revisions to work on for LA.
BTW, I will be at the ISOC security symposium next week to discuss any of this.
Robert Moskowitz
Chrysler Corporation
(810) 758-8212