[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Straw Poll and Photuris

To: ipsec@ans.net
Subject: Straw Poll and Photuris
From: Craig Metz <cmetz@inner.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 1996 15:48:19 -0500
Reply-To: ipsec@ans.net
Sender: ipsec-owner@ans.net


	As a result of some private communications, I'd just like to publicly
voice that I think that the Photuris protocol is a viable and reasonable
contender for Internet standards-track status and shouldn't be derailed.
However, I also think that it's very important the the spec document be as
well done as possible, and I have not seen anything in the new straw poll
consensus that is an unreasonable requirement for a specification to provide.
I'd like to see the Photuris spec changed to meet these requirements so that
it (and we) can move on to more important things like trying to implement.

								-Craig

Prev by Date: Re: ADMIN: Straw Poll Results on Key Mgmt
Next by Date: Re: (radius) FWD: (mobile-ip) MD5 Key recovery attack
Prev by thread: Re: (mobile-ip) MD5 Key recovery attack
Next by thread: Re: Straw Poll and Photuris
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread