[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: what I am proposing re HMAC

To: smb@research.att.com
Subject: Re: what I am proposing re HMAC
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 1996 13:23:01 -0500
Cc: ipsec@ans.net
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 01 Mar 1996 12:58:42 EST." <199603011804.NAA29924@linet02.li.net>
MMDF-Warning: Unable to confirm address in preceding line at neptune.TIS.COM
Reply-To: perry@piermont.com
Sender: ipsec-request@neptune.tis.com


smb@research.att.com writes, re my proposal:
> There's no problem with any of this.  But we need point 6 -- the status
> of 1828 and HMAC as mandatory/recommended/elective etc.  What do we
> tell people they MUST implement?  My own view is to make HMAC mandatory
> and 1828 recommended -- and recommended only because there's already
> a lot out there.

I agree fully with your amendment. This seems like "the right thing". 

Perry

Prev by Date: Re: what I am proposing re HMAC
Next by Date: Re: what I am proposing re HMAC
Prev by thread: Re: what I am proposing re HMAC
Next by thread: IETF meetings :(
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread