[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ESP transform with RC5
In a galaxy far, far away, : Mon, 18 Mar 1996 16:44:04 EST
> > This was August 1995. Vendors wanted to interoperate *soon*
>
> August 1995 was after the IPsec documents had gone to RFC (indeed, the
> documents are dated August, 1995). They had long since been in last
Again, I'm reporting what was discussed. I don't think the timing of the
RFCs has much to do with what has been implemented and what has not been
implemented.
Why was swIPe on the table? I believe that TIS and Raptor have firewalls
out their in the field running it.
Why was SKIP on the table (and yes, there *is* a pre-IPsec version)? Sun
was there talking about it. They *said* there were two versions that that
the IPsec version was being worked on as they spoke.
> Actually it wasn't out there any longer; it had more or less been
> informally withdrawn long before, after the Toronto IETF as I
> recall. It was just an experiment.
S/WAN is *not* a proposed IETF standard. It is a set of parameters that
explains how to interoperate *today*. We could have picked swIPe, for instance.
> Why did they have a "spec" at all when we had RFC's 1825-1829 already
> out? This all strikes me as odd.
The 'spec' is says what S/WAN is going to test. I'd call it a "test spec"
more than a design spec.
I don't recall discussion about RC4 or RC5 from other than RSA people. But,
again, we were pretty clear about what there interests were.
References: