[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ESP over TCP?

To: ipsec@TIS.COM, PALAMBER@us.oracle.com
Subject: Re: ESP over TCP?
From: touch@isi.edu
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 1996 09:58:57 -0700
MMDF-Warning: Parse error in original version of preceding line at neptune.TIS.COM
Posted-Date: Wed, 24 Apr 1996 09:58:57 -0700
Sender: ipsec-approval@neptune.tis.com

> From ipsec-request@neptune.tis.com Tue Apr 23 19:27:54 1996
> Date: 23 Apr 96 18:55:19 -0700
> From: "PALAMBER.US.ORACLE.COM" <PALAMBER@us.oracle.com>
> To: ipsec@tis.com
> Subject: ESP over TCP?
>  
> Greg,  
...
> ESP is simple because it "encapsulates" the payload. Exposing port numbers is 
> a very bad idea because it violates implementation layering, it violates some 
...
> Paul  

Why is implementation layering good?

Joe
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Joe Touch - touch@isi.edu		    http://www.isi.edu/~touch/
ISI / Project Leader, ATOMIC-2, LSAM       http://www.isi.edu/atomic2/
USC / Research Assistant Prof.                http://www.isi.edu/lsam/

Prev by Date: Re: clear ports
Next by Date: Re: clear ports
Prev by thread: ESP over TCP?
Next by thread: Re: ESP over TCP?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread