[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ISAKMP null transforms

To: Brett Howard <bretth@ca.newbridge.com>
Subject: Re: ISAKMP null transforms
From: "C. Harald Koch" <chk@border.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 1996 17:56:21 -0400
Cc: dharkins@cisco.com, ipsec@TIS.COM
In-Reply-To: bretth's message of "Tue, 18 Jun 1996 16:29:27 -0400". <199606182029.QAA05194@thor.ca.newbridge.com>
Organization: Border Network Technologies Inc.
Phone: +1 416 368 7157
References: <199606182029.QAA05194@thor.ca.newbridge.com>
Sender: ipsec-approval@neptune.tis.com

In message <199606182029.QAA05194@thor.ca.newbridge.com>, Brett Howard writes:
> 
> Well, I'm not sure I agree.  When I send a list of transforms in some
> order, I implicitly state both a list of capabilities (all members
> on the list) and an ordering of preferences.  Not "wanting" to do
> AH doesn't imply that I'm not "willing" to do it should my peer deem
> it necessary.  I would like to say "I'd prefer no AH, but here's
> what I'll accept in order of preference: blah blah".

Um, this may be a silly idea, but could we steal some ideas from the PPP
option negotiation mechanisms here?

-- 
C. Harald Koch          | Border Network Technologies Inc.
chk@border.com          | Senior System Developer
+1 416 368 7157 (voice) | 20 Toronto Street, Suite 400, Toronto ON M5C 2B8
+1 416 368 7789 (fax)   | Madness takes its toll. Please have exact change.

References:

Re: ISAKMP null transforms

From: Brett Howard <bretth@ca.newbridge.com>

Prev by Date: Oakley primes and EC groups
Next by Date: Re: UUNET Network Encryption Patents
Prev by thread: Re: ISAKMP null transforms
Next by thread: Re: ISAKMP null transforms
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread