[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: DNS? was Re: Key Management, anyone?

To: PALAMBER@us.oracle.com
Subject: Re: DNS? was Re: Key Management, anyone?
From: Hilarie Orman <ho@earth.hpc.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 1996 05:15:04 -0400
Cc: ipsec@TIS.COM
In-Reply-To: Yourmessage <9607312301.AA16100@maildig1.us.oracle.com>
Sender: ipsec-approval@neptune.tis.com

I agree with the individual points, but I'm not convinced by the conclusion.
Why isn't DNSSEC the appropriate minimal common basis for authentication?
I believe we need such a basis, and DNSSEC seems to be the obvious choice.
This wouldn't rule out the optional use of other methods.

TCP requires IP, so the IETF guidelines cannot be taken too seriously in
the regard to banning protocol dependencies!

Follow-Ups:

Re: DNS? was Re: Key Management, anyone?

From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>

Prev by Date: Re: Key Management, anyone? (DNS keying)
Next by Date: Re: Question on TCP MSS with repsect to IPSEC
Prev by thread: Re: Key Management, anyone? (DNS keying)
Next by thread: Re: DNS? was Re: Key Management, anyone?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread