Please no voting! The IETF does not vote, it runs on rough consensous and running code. Given that most of the work is on a mailing list there is much room for abuse of e-mail votes. Any straw polls (or ballots) now will only ignite additional unproductive debate. A decision is being made by the Security Area Director and will be announced very soon. >Let's all chill out for a day and see what the AD has to say tomorrow. Yes! Regards, Paul A. Lambert co-chair of IPsec ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Paul Lambert Director of Security Products Oracle Corporation Phone: (415) 506-0370 500 Oracle Parkway, Box 659410 Fax: (415) 633-2963 Redwood Shores, CA 94065 E-Mail: palamber@us.oracle.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "Secure Jobs" -> send resumes to: palamber@us.oracle.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-- BEGIN included message
- To: IPSEC ,<ipsec@tis.com>
- Subject: RE: Concerns
- From: "Roy Pereira <rpereira@timestep.com>" <ipsec-request@neptune.hq.tis.com>
- Date: 18 Sep 96 11:21:38
- Organization: TimeStep Corporation
- Sender: ipsec-approval@neptune.hq.tis.com
>> This is not what I saw. I saw only a handful voting for SKIP, a few >> more for ISAKMP/Oakley, and the vast majority with their hands down. >This is remarkable, since there wasn't a vote on SKIP vs. ISAKMP >at the Montreal meeting. A quick way to solve this small (and irrelevant) discussion is to have an online vote by having everyone email one person with an answer to the following question: Pick one: a) SKIP b) ISAKMP/OAKLEY c) Don't care
-- END included message