[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Deafening Silence
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Thu, 10 Oct 1996, Ran Atkinson wrote:
>On Oct 10, 11:17am, Oliver Spatscheck wrote:
>
>% Correct me if I am wrong but the CISCO implementation only covers
>% the draft-ietf-ipsec-oakley written by CISCO.
>
>Wrong on two counts.
>
>Firstly, more than one cisco implementation exists, as I explained
>in my previous note.
Sorry for using the singular.
>
>Secondly, it is my understanding that the UNIX implementation that you refer
>to implements more than is in the isakmp-oakley resolution draft (and, no,
>I haven't looked at the source code myself because I'm too busy with IPv6
>coding).
>
Could somebody speak up how they defined the payloads for Oakley
in the implementation which covers more than the
isakmp-oakley resolution draft? As mentioned earlier the definitions
in the Oakley draft are obsolete.
I guess that would help fixing the Oakley draft.
Oliver
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBMl1YpznVPgUZ7uZJAQFXXQP6AurRP1aVhrg2hlL1unDtzER6mRlXRmFE
PNKjEXmTzZ3Ab31QZBL7ITYxNwQ2CbT8RywOXg/WRx7qpWQXRVzHUG8VS/0zNe4+
IviZgXtMUvDBIXGXh+4N6jImhEN0zGKfZbLhApmy3FYetG+nDldpY9PWFbyy6AsK
k+Urj8kInkQ=
=2X/a
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----