RE:Packet-by-packet compression within IPSec

["RIITTINEN HEIKKI" <heikki.riittinen@fin1401.icl.fi>]

Bob Monsour:
>MY PROPOSAL
>
>The essence of my proposal is to add simple, straightforward language
>(provided below) to the ESP draft which allows compression to be performed
>on a packet-by-packet basis (keeping *NO* history or state information
>across packets). The use of compression would be negotiated as an security
>association parameter along with the algorithm to be employed. The ESP
>payload data would simply be either compressed or uncompressed and *NO*
>additional fields (in the header *OR* in the payload) would be required to
>support it. This is the simplest form of compression support. 

>Bob Monsour
>rmonsour@earthlink.net

I fully support the proposal. We have implemented a prototype
of a proprietary "encryption" (stateless compression and standard
encryption) that fulfills all the requirements set by the proposal.

Heikki.Riittinen@teamw.com from Europe

---

• Prev by Date: Re: Decoupling compression and security
• Next by Date: Re: Decoupling compression and security
• Prev by thread: Re: Packet-by-packet compression within IPSec
• Next by thread: compression transform conclusions
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread