[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re[4]: AH (without ESP) on a secure gateway

To: "Whelan, Bill" <bwhelan@nei.com>
Subject: Re: Re[4]: AH (without ESP) on a secure gateway
From: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@apollo.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 1996 18:10:28 -0500
Cc: kent@bbn.com, ho@earth.hpc.org, ipsec@tis.com
In-Reply-To: bwhelan's message of Mon, 02 Dec 1996 17:27:43 -0500. <9611028495.AA849576552@netx.nei.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com

> Well I'm not sure I understand the notation (AH defined in RFC 1826 
> doesn't have source/destination addresses), but I was thinking of the 
> former case.

What I meant by "AH[x->y]" was AH using an SA or SPI from x to y..

In other words, x and y know the SA's key; y allocated the SPI, and is
prepared to receive traffic authenticated using the key.

Does that make sense?

						- Bill

References:

Re[4]: AH (without ESP) on a secure gateway

From: "Whelan, Bill" <bwhelan@nei.com>

Prev by Date: Re[4]: AH (without ESP) on a secure gateway
Next by Date: Re[4]: AH (without ESP) on a secure gateway
Prev by thread: Re[4]: AH (without ESP) on a secure gateway
Next by thread: Re[4]: AH (without ESP) on a secure gateway
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread