Ipsec Mail Inbox
Thread Index
Re: Last Call: HMAC-IP (Truncated HMAC-SHA)
From
: "H.Krawczyk" <hugo@watson.ibm.com>
Re: Reminder: Release 0.4 of my Linux IPSEC code is out.
From
: Robert Moskowitz <rgm3@chrysler.com>
Q: test vectors for HMAC-SHA-1
From
: "Niels Ferguson" <niels@DigiCash.com>
Path MTU Discovery
From
: "Angelos D. Keromytis" <angelos@aurora.cis.upenn.edu>
Re: Q: test vectors for HMAC-SHA-1
From
: Robert Moskowitz <rgm3@chrysler.com>
RE: test vectors for HMAC-SHA-1 - Test Data and Bad News
From
: Robert Moskowitz <rgm3@chrysler.com>
RE: test vectors for HMAC-SHA-1 - Test Data and Bad News
From
: Edward Russell <erussell@ftp.com>
RE: test vectors for HMAC-SHA-1 - Test Data and Bad News
From
: Michael Sabin <mike.sabin@worldnet.att.net>
Re: test vectors for HMAC-SHA-1 - Test Data and Bad News
From
: "C. Harald Koch" <chk@border.com>
RE: test vectors for HMAC-SHA-1 - Test Data and Bad News
From
: Robert Moskowitz <rgm3@chrysler.com>
RE: test vectors for HMAC-SHA-1 - Test Data
From
: Robert Glenn <glenn@snad.ncsl.nist.gov>
RE: test vectors for HMAC-SHA-1 - Test Data and Bad News
From
: Rodney Thayer <rodney@sabletech.com>
RE: test vectors for HMAC-SHA-1 - Test Data and Bad News
From
: Edward Russell <erussell@ftp.com>
HMAC-SHA test results
From
: pau@watson.ibm.com
RE: test vectors for HMAC-SHA-1 - Test Data and Bad News
From
: Edward Russell <erussell@ftp.com>
Re: HMAC-SHA test results
From
: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com
Re: Path MTU Discovery
From
: Dan.McDonald@eng.sun.com (Dan McDonald)
Re: test vectors for HMAC-SHA-1 - Test Data and Bad News -Reply
From
: John Kennedy <JKENNEDY@novell.com>
RE: test vectors for HMAC-SHA-1
From
: Tom Markham <markham@sctc.com>
RE: test vectors for HMAC-SHA-1 - Test Data and Bad News
From
: Greg Carter <carterg@entrust.com>
Re: test vectors for HMAC-SHA-1 - Test Data and Bad News
From
: "C. Harald Koch" <chk@border.com>
RE: test vectors for HMAC-SHA-1 - Test Data and Bad News -Reply
From
: John Kennedy <JKENNEDY@novell.com>
RE: test vectors for HMAC-SHA-1 - Test Data and Bad News
From
: Michael Sabin <mike.sabin@worldnet.att.net>
Re: Path MTU Discovery
From
: "Angelos D. Keromytis" <angelos@aurora.cis.upenn.edu>
Re: Path MTU Discovery
From
: Dan.McDonald@eng.sun.com (Dan McDonald)
Re: Path MTU Discovery
From
: "Angelos D. Keromytis" <angelos@aurora.cis.upenn.edu>
Replay field size in AH
From
: Naganand Doraswamy <naganand@ftp.com>
RE: test vectors for HMAC-SHA-1 - Test Data and Bad News -Reply
From
: Rodney Thayer <rodney@sabletech.com>
Re: test vectors for HMAC-SHA-1 - Test Data and Bad News
From
: Uri Blumenthal <uri@watson.ibm.com>
Re: Path MTU Discovery
From
: Dan.McDonald@Eng.sun.com (Dan McDonald)
Re: Path MTU Discovery
From
: Craig Metz <cmetz@inner.net>
Re: Path MTU Discovery
From
: "Angelos D. Keromytis" <angelos@aurora.cis.upenn.edu>
Re: Path MTU Discovery
From
: Ran Atkinson <rja@inet.org>
Re: Path MTU Discovery
From
: Ben Rogers <ben@ascend.com>
Re: test vectors for HMAC-SHA-1 - Test Data and Bad News -Reply
From
: Daniel Harkins <dharkins@cisco.com>
Re: Replay field size in AH
From
: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Re: Replay field size in AH
From
: Ran Atkinson <rja@inet.org>
RE: Replay field size in AH
From
: adams@cisco.com (Rob Adams)
replay field size
From
: Derrell Piper <piper@tgv.com>
Re: replay field size
From
: Matt Thomas <thomas@lkg.dec.com>
Re: Replay field size in AH
From
: Rodney Thayer <rodney@sabletech.com>
RE: replay field size
From
: Roy Pereira <rpereira@TimeStep.com>
RE: replay field size
From
: Ran Atkinson <rja@inet.org>
Re: Replay field size in AH
From
: Ran Atkinson <rja@inet.org>
Re: replay field size
From
: Matt Thomas <matt@lkg.dec.com>
RE: replay field size
From
: Roy Pereira <rpereira@TimeStep.com>
Re: Replay field size in AH
From
: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
RE: replay field size
From
: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Re: Path MTU Discovery
From
: Oliver Spatscheck <spatsch@cs.arizona.edu>
Re: replay field size
From
: Tim Bass (IETF) <ietf@linux.silkroad.com>
RE: replay field size
From
: adams@cisco.com (Rob Adams)
Re: replay field size
From
: Dan.McDonald@Eng.sun.com (Dan McDonald)
Re: Path MTU Discovery
From
: Ran Atkinson <rja@inet.org>
RE: replay field size
From
: Ran Atkinson <rja@inet.org>
Re: Path MTU Discovery
From
: Ran Atkinson <rja@inet.org>
ANX IPSEC bakeoff
From
: Kent Fitch <Kent.Fitch@its.csiro.au>
Re: Path MTU Discovery
From
: "Angelos D. Keromytis" <angelos@aurora.cis.upenn.edu>
Re: ANX IPSEC bakeoff
From
: Robert Moskowitz <rgm3@chrysler.com>
RE: replay field size straw poll
From
: dpkemp@missi.ncsc.mil (David P. Kemp)
RE: replay field size
From
: Dan.McDonald@Eng.sun.com (Dan McDonald)
RE: replay field size
From
: Roy Pereira <rpereira@TimeStep.com>
RE: replay field size straw poll
From
: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Re: replay field size
From
: Robert Glenn <glenn@snad.ncsl.nist.gov>
RE: replay field size
From
: mjo@tycho.ncsc.mil (Michael J. Oehler)
Re: replay field size straw poll
From
: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@research.att.com>
Re[2]: Path MTU Discovery
From
: "Whelan, Bill" <bwhelan@nei.com>
RE: replay field size
From
: Phil Karn <karn@qualcomm.com>
Re: replay field size
From
: "Niels Ferguson" <niels@DigiCash.com>
RE: replay field size
From
: roy@CheckPoint.COM (Roy Shamir)
Re: replay field size
From
: Germano Caronni <caronni@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
RE: replay field size straw poll
From
: Robert Glenn <glenn@snad.ncsl.nist.gov>
Truncation (was Re: replay field size)
From
: saiz@gc.ssr.upm.es ("LUIS SAIZ GIMENO")
Re: replay field size
From
: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@MIT.EDU>
Re: replay field size
From
: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Re: replay field size
From
: John Keating <jkeating@ire.com>
RE: replay field size
From
: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Re: replay field size
From
: "Niels Ferguson" <niels@DigiCash.com>
RE: replay field size -Reply
From
: CJ Lee <CJ_LEE@novell.com>
Re: replay field size
From
: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@apollo.hp.com>
Re: replay field size
From
: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@MIT.EDU>
RE: replay field size straw poll
From
: Naganand Doraswamy <naganand@ftp.com>
Re: replay field size
From
: Uri Blumenthal <uri@watson.ibm.com>
Re: Truncation (was Re: replay field size)
From
: "Niels Ferguson" <niels@DigiCash.com>
RE: replay field size straw poll
From
: adams@cisco.com (Rob Adams)
Re: replay field size
From
: Derrell Piper <piper@tgv.com>
RE: replay field size
From
: Bob Monsour <rmonsour@earthlink.net>
"Transforms" per se going away?
From
: Dan.McDonald@Eng.sun.com (Dan McDonald)
Re: "Transforms" per se going away?
From
: Daniel Harkins <dharkins@cisco.com>
Re: replay field size
From
: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Re: replay field size straw poll
From
: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Re: replay field size
From
: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Re: replay field size
From
: Ran Atkinson <rja@inet.org>
RE: replay field size
From
: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Re: IPsec hardware accelerators (Rainbow warning)
From
: "PALAMBER.US.ORACLE.COM" <PALAMBER@us.oracle.com>
Re: replay field size, straw poll
From
: yael@radguard.com
RE: replay field size straw poll
From
: "Luis A. Sanchez" <lsanchez@bbn.com>
RE: "Transforms" per se going away?
From
: Roy Pereira <rpereira@TimeStep.com>
Re: replay field size
From
: Ran Atkinson <rja@inet.org>
Re: replay field size
From
: Steven Bellovin <smb@research.att.com>
Straw Poll and Alignment
From
: "C. Harald Koch" <chk@utcc.utoronto.ca>
Re: replay field size
From
: wei@tis.com
RE: replay field size straw poll
From
: wei@tis.com
Re: "Transforms" per se going away?
From
: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
RE: Straw Poll and Alignment
From
: adams@cisco.com (Rob Adams)
Re: Straw Poll and Alignment
From
: "C. Harald Koch" <chk@utcc.utoronto.ca>
Re: Straw Poll and Alignment
From
: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@MIT.EDU>
Re: test vectors for HMAC-SHA-1 - Test Data and Bad News
From
: Daniel Harkins <dharkins@cisco.com>
Quick Mode and KE payloads
From
: Greg Carter <carterg@entrust.com>
Re: test vectors for HMAC-SHA-1 - Test Data and Bad News
From
: Rodney Thayer <rodney@sabletech.com>
Re: replay field size
From
: Ran Atkinson <rja@inet.org>
Re: replay field size
From
: Jim Thompson <jim@hosaka.smallworks.com>
32 bit counter -- 96 bit HMAC-SHA/MD5
From
: HUGO@watson.ibm.com
Re: test vectors for HMAC-SHA-1 - Test Data and Bad News
From
: Daniel Harkins <dharkins@cisco.com>
Re: Quick Mode and KE payloads
From
: Daniel Harkins <dharkins@cisco.com>
Re: 32 bit counter -- 96 bit HMAC-SHA/MD5
From
: Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
Re: 32 bit counter -- 96 bit HMAC-SHA/MD5
From
: Steven Bellovin <smb@research.att.com>
Re: 32 bit counter -- 96 bit HMAC-SHA/MD5
From
: Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
Re: 32 bit counter -- 96 bit HMAC-SHA/MD5
From
: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@MIT.EDU>
Re: 32 bit counter -- 96 bit HMAC-SHA/MD5
From
: Steven Bellovin <smb@research.att.com>
Re: 32 bit counter -- 96 bit HMAC-SHA/MD5
From
: Bart Preneel <Bart.Preneel@esat.kuleuven.ac.be>
Re: replay field size
From
: Bart Preneel <Bart.Preneel@esat.kuleuven.ac.be>
TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: Bob Monsour <rmonsour@earthlink.net>
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: Marcel Waldvogel <mwa@ebony.ccrc.wustl.edu>
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: Daniel Harkins <dharkins@cisco.com>
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: Germano Caronni <caronni@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: Rodney Thayer <rodney@sabletech.com>
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: Derek Palma <dpalma@netcom.com>
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: Matt Thomas <matt@lkg.dec.com>
IP SEC update query
From
: John McWilliams <jmcwilliams@tis.com>
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: carrel@ipsec.org
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: Matt Thomas <matt@lkg.dec.com>
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: Derek Palma <dpalma@netcom.com>
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: Daniel Harkins <dharkins@cisco.com>
RE: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: Roy Pereira <rpereira@TimeStep.com>
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: Karl Fox <karl@ascend.com>
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: Naganand Doraswamy <naganand@ftp.com>
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: "Angelos D. Keromytis" <angelos@aurora.cis.upenn.edu>
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: "C. Harald Koch" <chk@utcc.utoronto.ca>
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: "C. Harald Koch" <chk@utcc.utoronto.ca>
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: Steven Bellovin <smb@research.att.com>
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: "Bob Monsour" <rmonsour@earthlink.net>
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: "Bob Monsour" <rmonsour@earthlink.net>
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: "Angelos D. Keromytis" <angelos@aurora.cis.upenn.edu>
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: Karl Fox <karl@ascend.com>
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: Karl Fox <karl@ascend.com>
RE: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: adams@cisco.com (Rob Adams)
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: Scott Marcus <smarcus@bbnplanet.com>
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: Matt Thomas <matt@lkg.dec.com>
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: Dennis Glatting <dennis.glatting@plaintalk.bellevue.wa.us>
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: Bob Monsour <rmonsour@earthlink.net>
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: Bob Monsour <rmonsour@earthlink.net>
RE: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: Bob Monsour <rmonsour@earthlink.net>
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: Bob Monsour <rmonsour@earthlink.net>
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: Bob Monsour <rmonsour@earthlink.net>
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: Bob Monsour <rmonsour@earthlink.net>
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: jim@hosaka.smallworks.com (Jim Thompson)
RE: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: Bob Monsour <rmonsour@earthlink.net>
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: "Angelos D. Keromytis" <angelos@aurora.cis.upenn.edu>
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: Bob Monsour <rmonsour@earthlink.net>
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: "C. Harald Koch" <chk@utcc.utoronto.ca>
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: "John W. Richardson" <jwr@ibeam.jf.intel.com>
RE: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: Roy Pereira <rpereira@TimeStep.com>
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: EKR <ekr@terisa.com>
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@apollo.hp.com>
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@apollo.hp.com>
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: "C. Harald Koch" <chk@utcc.utoronto.ca>
RE: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: adams@cisco.com (Rob Adams)
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: Bob Monsour <rmonsour@earthlink.net>
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@apollo.hp.com>
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: Derrell Piper <piper@tgv.com>
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: Dennis Glatting <dennis.glatting@plaintalk.bellevue.wa.us>
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: "Terry L. Davis, Boeing Information & Support Services, Bellevue, WA" <tld5032@commanche.ca.boeing.com>
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: EKR <ekr@terisa.com>
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: Dennis Glatting <dennis.glatting@plaintalk.bellevue.wa.us>
RE: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: adams@cisco.com (Rob Adams)
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
IPsec Straw Poll results
From
: Ran Atkinson <rja@inet.org>
Re: IPsec Straw Poll results
From
: Robert Glenn <glenn@snad.ncsl.nist.gov>
IPsec Straw Poll results
From
: HUGO@watson.ibm.com
HMAC with SHS
From
: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com
Just to be clear on truncation...
From
: Dan.McDonald@Eng.sun.com (Dan McDonald)
re: HMAC with SHS
From
: "Edward A. Russell" <erussell@ftp.com>
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: Rodney Thayer <rodney@sabletech.com>
No Subject
From
: ormonde@trem.cnt.org.br (Rodrigo Ormonde)
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
RE: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
ISAKMP - New Version
From
: wdm@epoch.ncsc.mil (W. Douglas Maughan)
RE: Path MTU Discovery
From
: Sanjay Anand <sanjayan@microsoft.com>
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: Dennis Glatting <dennis.glatting@plaintalk.bellevue.wa.us>
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: Kent Fitch <Kent.Fitch@its.csiro.au>
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipsec-isakmp-07.txt, .ps
From
: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
V7 - Clarification of Alignment
From
: "Edward A. Russell" <erussell@ftp.com>
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipsec-isakmp-oakley-03.txt
From
: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
RE: Path MTU Discovery
From
: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: Phil Karn <karn@qualcomm.com>
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: Phil Karn <karn@qualcomm.com>
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: Phil Karn <karn@qualcomm.com>
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: Bob Monsour <rmonsour@earthlink.net>
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: Phil Karn <karn@qualcomm.com>
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: Marcel Waldvogel <mwa@ebony.ccrc.wustl.edu>
transport vs network and ipsec syn
From
: "Arthur Parkos" <parkosar@pb.com>
Re: transport vs network and ipsec syn
From
: Dan.McDonald@Eng.sun.com (Dan McDonald)
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
From
: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Mail converted by
MHonArc
2.0.0 alpha 2