[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: test vectors for HMAC-SHA-1 - Test Data and Bad News -Reply

To: Rodney Thayer <rodney@sabletech.com>
Subject: Re: test vectors for HMAC-SHA-1 - Test Data and Bad News -Reply
From: Daniel Harkins <dharkins@cisco.com>
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 1997 10:36:06 -0800
Cc: John Kennedy <JKENNEDY@novell.com>, ipsec@tis.com
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 07 Feb 1997 09:54:05 EST." <3.0.16.19970207094329.1c2fbda4@pop3.pn.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com

Rodney Thayer wrote:
> In thinking about this I believe the problem has crossed "endian" boundries
> already so I don't think this is it.  I'm going to rerun the DH tests on a
> non-intel box to see if that changes things.  I know the code Ed and I were
> originally discussing was running on an Intel machine.  I don't know for
> sure if the Cylink code was running on an Intel box.

It was running on both. The laptop we were using was little-endian and the
router was big-endian. Both could interoperate with other implementations
which shared the same crypto lib pedigree (i.e. the cylink one).

  Dan.

References:

RE: test vectors for HMAC-SHA-1 - Test Data and Bad News -Reply

From: Rodney Thayer <rodney@sabletech.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Path MTU Discovery
Next by Date: Re: Replay field size in AH
Prev by thread: RE: test vectors for HMAC-SHA-1 - Test Data and Bad News -Reply
Next by thread: RE: test vectors for HMAC-SHA-1
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread