[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: truncation

To: Rob Adams <adams@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: truncation
From: Rob & Rachel Glenn <rrglenn@erols.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 1997 15:10:49 -0500
CC: ipsec@tis.com
References: <01BC27DC.7D4CBA00@Tastid.cisco.com>
Reply-To: rrglenn@erols.com
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com

Yes, the HMAC hash's will be truncated to 96 bits.  I hope to have the
"new" AH-HMAC drafts out sometime next week.  I can't speak for
Jim Hughes draft.

Rob G.

Rob Adams wrote:
> 
> Did we ever decide definitively on truncating MD5 and SHA hash's to 96 bits?
> I think we did but I just want to be clear.
> 
> Also, how does this apply to the Hughes Combined transform?  Do we truncate
> the MD5 hash there also?  I hope so for uniformity's sake.
> 
> -Rob

References:

truncation

From: adams@cisco.com (Rob Adams)

Prev by Date: Grouping SAs (was Re: How many algorithms per SA/Transform?)
Next by Date: Re: Grouping SAs (was Re: How many algorithms per SA/Transform?)
Prev by thread: truncation
Next by thread: Re: truncation
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread