[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Purpose of AIAG discussion list....
For those of you not interested in what is going on the AIAG list, but want
to know why it exists, here is a note that I posted on it a week ago to
clear this up, I hope.
>Reply-To: rgm3@is.chrysler.com
>X-Sender: rgm3@dilbert.is.chrysler.com
>Date: Wed, 12 Mar 1997 16:57:22 -0500
>To: anx-sec@dot.netrex.net, anx-sec@dot.netrex.net,
> Naganand Doraswamy <naganand@ftp.com>
>From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm3@is.chrysler.com>
>Subject: Re: developers list
>Sender: owner-anx-sec@dot.netrex.net
>Reply-To: anx-sec@dot.netrex.net
>
>At 05:02 PM 3/8/97 Time, Ran Atkinson wrote:
>>
>>Paul Lambert and I would like to suggest that the implementer discussions
>>occur on the main IPsec list rather than on some sidebar list. This
>>helps keep everyone in sync. Also, the IPsec list is not so noisy these
>>days that it is an issue to have implementer discussions on the main
>>list.
>
>The purpose of this list is to allow vendors and AIAG members to move IPsec
>forward to implementation in step with the ANX schedule. To this extent,
>defining what will be needed in terms of the protocols, and what is not
>clear can definitely be handled on this list.
>
>However, when things are unclear in understanding the specs, or when
>particular insights are learned here, these really have to go to the main
>IPsec list.
>
>I also plan on keeping the main IPsec list abreast of what our requirements
>- expectations - experiences are.
>
>As an ADMIN note, Ran has been on this list since I started it. I was very
>appreciative of Steve Kent to be willing to add this list to his traffic to
>gain his insights. But to all non-coders or non-auto-implementors, I ask
>you to understand our purpose (get product out that interoperates) and our
>schedule.
>
>
>Robert Moskowitz
>Chrysler Corporation
>(810) 758-8212
>
>
Robert Moskowitz
Chrysler Corporation
(810) 758-8212