[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Closing out the COMPRESSION discussion

To: rja@inet.org
Subject: Re: Closing out the COMPRESSION discussion
From: ho@earth.hpc.org (Hilarie Orman)
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 1997 09:45:10 -0500
Cc: rgm3@chrysler.com, ipsec@tis.com
In-reply-to: Yourmessage <Chameleon.858823553.rja@c8-a.snvl1.sfba.home.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com

As I mentioned in San Jose, Bill Sommerfeld's version of inline keying
is not at all what I mean.  What I mean is carrying an identifier in
the ESP header that can be hashed with a pre-established secret to
produce the unique key for the packet payload.  This can be done many
times to achieve uni-directional rekeying before security would demand
that the pre-established secret be changed.

I think the distinction is inline keys vs. inline key exchanges.

Hilarie

Follow-Ups:

Re: inline keying

From: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@apollo.hp.com>

References:

Re: Closing out the COMPRESSION discussion

From: Ran Atkinson <rja@inet.org>

Prev by Date: Re: the COMPRESSION discussion
Next by Date: Re: the COMPRESSION discussion
Prev by thread: Re: Closing out the COMPRESSION discussion
Next by thread: Re: inline keying
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread