[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: the COMPRESSION discussion

To: Ran Atkinson <rja@inet.org>
Subject: Re: the COMPRESSION discussion
From: Dennis Glatting <dennis.glatting@plaintalk.bellevue.wa.us>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 97 10:03:08 -0800
cc: ipsec@tis.com
References: <3.0.32.19970319234159.009c34e0@earthlink.net> <Chameleon.858872555.rja@c8-a.snvl1.sfba.home.com>
Reply-To: dennis.glatting@plaintalk.bellevue.wa.us
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com


> Those who really want to make progress on this should write up
> some concrete protocol specifications in the form of an I-D,
> put it online, present it to the WG in Memphis, and see whether
> the WG as a whole is comfortable with that approach.  Such an I-D
> should try to answer the questions I've posed.
>

I'm confused, don't we already have such documents?
(draft-sabin-esp-des3-lzs-md5-00.txt and
draft-sabin-lzs-payload-00.txt)


-dpg

References:

Re: the COMPRESSION discussion

From: Bob Monsour <rmonsour@earthlink.net>

Re: the COMPRESSION discussion

From: Ran Atkinson <rja@inet.org>

Prev by Date: Re: the COMPRESSION discussion
Next by Date: How about a DESX transform?
Prev by thread: Re: the COMPRESSION discussion
Next by thread: Re: the COMPRESSION discussion
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread