[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Vendor Interests (was Re: "Pillage first, then burn" - Attila the Hun)

To: "James Hughes" <hughes@nsco.network.com>
Subject: Vendor Interests (was Re: "Pillage first, then burn" - Attila the Hun)
From: "C. Harald Koch" <chk@utcc.utoronto.ca>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 1997 10:20:45 -0500
cc: "Steve Sneddon" <sned@cisco.com>, ipsec@tis.com
In-reply-to: hughes's message of "Fri, 21 Mar 1997 13:50:52 -0500". <AF5834BB-4DC0DA@129.191.63.3>
References: <AF5834BB-4DC0DA@129.191.63.3>
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com

In message <AF5834BB-4DC0DA@129.191.63.3>, "James Hughes" writes:
> 
> I find that Cisco claiming the right to lead the discussions and host such
> a BOF to be incredulous.

I assume that everyone participating in this discussion is an individual,
and not a mindless slave to their employer's desires. It's certainly the
case that at each IETF meeting, the participants remain the same while the
"company names" on people's badges keep changing; this would support my
assumption.

-- 
Harald Koch <chk@utcc.utoronto.ca>

References:

Re: "Pillage first, then burn" - Attila the Hun

From: "James Hughes" <hughes@nsco.network.com>

Prev by Date: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipsec-ah-hmac-md5-96-00.txt
Next by Date: Re: Proposed changes to ESP (andf a little AH too)
Prev by thread: Re: "Pillage first, then burn" - Attila the Hun
Next by thread: Re: "Pillage first, then burn" - Attila the Hun
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread