[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: auditing

To: adams@cisco.com (Rob Adams)
Subject: Re: auditing
From: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@apollo.hp.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 1997 19:21:27 -0500
Cc: Dan.McDonald@Eng.sun.com ('Dan McDonald'), ipsec@tis.com (ipsec@tis.com)
In-Reply-To: adams's message of Wed, 02 Apr 1997 16:17:35 -0800. <01BC3F81.69FF4780@Tastid.cisco.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com

> >... a BYPASS setting for privileged applications.
>
> Some platforms don't have the notion of privileged
> applications. ie. Windows 95.

Actually, it was my impression that Win95 doesn't have a notion of
*un*priviledged applications.  This is a subtle, but important,
distinction..

						- Bill

Follow-Ups:

Re: auditing

From: Dan.McDonald@Eng.sun.com (Dan McDonald)

References:

RE: auditing

From: adams@cisco.com (Rob Adams)

Prev by Date: RE: auditing
Next by Date: Re: auditing
Prev by thread: RE: auditing
Next by thread: Re: auditing
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread