[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: comments on draft-ietf-new-auth-00

To: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Subject: Re: comments on draft-ietf-new-auth-00
From: Norman Shulman <norm@border.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Apr 1997 00:38:30 -0500
cc: Rob Adams <adams@cisco.com>, ipsec@tis.com
In-Reply-To: <v03007804af6bfc239ec4@[128.89.30.3]>
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com

On Sat, 5 Apr 1997, Stephen Kent wrote:

> Rob,
> 
> Section 3.2.2
> 	You caught me!  We'll reword to make it clear that the first packet
> packet on the wire should be number 1.   We'll also add that the receive
> counter should be initialized to 0.

In this case, Section 2.5 should be changed to state that the SA must be
changed prior to transmitting 2^32 packets.

Norm


                   Norman Shulman      Secure Computing Canada
     	        Systems Developer      Tel 1 416 813 2075
                  norm@border.com      Fax 1 416 813 2001

References:

Re: comments on draft-ietf-new-auth-00

From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>

Prev by Date: Re: comments on draft-ietf-ipsec-new-esp-00
Next by Date: Re: MUST vs. SHOULD audit
Prev by thread: Re: comments on draft-ietf-new-auth-00
Next by thread: Re[2]: auditing - ISAKMP
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread