[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Small subgroups and ISAKMP/Oakley



John Kennedy writes:
> During X9.42 development discussion it was not necessarily a 
> man-in-the-middle that was feared with regards to the small sub-group 
> attack.  Conceivably, one of the communicating parties could send a 
> "bad" public number on purpose.  Is this a realistic scenario?  

One of the legitimate parties might be a broken implementation that
doesn't correctly check whether it has computed a public exponential 
that lies in the small subgroup. 

-Lewis


References: