[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ESP revisions straw poll

To: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Subject: Re: ESP revisions straw poll
From: Bill Trost <trost@cs.pdx.edu>
Date: Wed, 21 May 1997 17:06:11 -0700
cc: ipsec@tis.com
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 13 May 1997 21:05:41 EDT." <v0300780aaf93d9d373f4@[128.89.30.17]>
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com

Stephen Kent writes:
    I've gotten the impression that there is support for encryptionless
    ESP....  So, I'd like to conduct a straw poll on this topic too.

After all this wrangling, I'd like to submit a straw of "whatever, let's
get this over with".  I think encryptionless ESP is a fine idea, but I see
no compelling need to mention it in the ESP draft.

On the other hand, Hugo comments on the security characteristics of the
Identity transform need to be included in *that* draft....

References:

ESP revisions straw poll

From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>

Prev by Date: new AH spec
Next by Date: Re: ESP revisions straw poll
Prev by thread: Re: ESP revisions straw poll
Next by thread: Re: ESP revisions straw poll
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread