[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: eliminate AH -- unanimous

To: "'William Allen Simpson'" <wsimpson@greendragon.com>, "'Steven Bellovin'" <smb@research.att.com>
Subject: RE: eliminate AH -- unanimous
From: Roy Pereira <rpereira@TimeStep.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 1997 09:48:03 -0400
Cc: "'ipsec@tis.com'" <ipsec@tis.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com

Steve, 

>*I'm perfectly content with any of these choices.  I don't give a rat's
>ass which is picked; all of them are (to my knowledge) secure, and
>since I'm not implementing anything these days the ugliness of some of
>the choices is purely esthetic.  They'll all work.  I want this spec
>finished, and the group disbanded.*

I couldn't agree more !  As can be seen by the latest rounds of ANX
testing that is going on right now, all of these specification changes
and ambiguity is causing major delays in interoperability.  Lets release
version 1.0 since we know it works.  Let's perhaps improve it and add
bells and whistles in version 1.1 !

Prev by Date: Re: New draft -- IPSEC AH
Next by Date: padding questions
Prev by thread: Re: eliminate AH -- unanimous
Next by thread: Re: Perplexed by padding values (was "padding values")
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread