Re: users and connections definitions

["Angelos D. Keromytis" <angelos@dsl.cis.upenn.edu>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


In message <v03007801afc6f905eeee@[128.89.0.110]>, Stephen Kent writes:
>>Maybe you do, but don't include me.  I like well-defined RFCs.
>
>For someone who purports to like well-defined (and presumably well-written)
>RFCs, the long series of Photuris I-Ds hardly serve as examplars.

As one of the Photuris implementors, i have to say that:
a) writing a draft for a key management protocol is not as easy as you
   might think
b) Bill has always been responsive to all comment i (and others) made
   on the draft(s) - the changes take place in less than a week,
   sometimes one or two days. That's better than i can say for others.
c) at this point, the Photuris drafts are much more readable than the
   ISAKMP/Oakley ones
d) the Photuris and the ISAKMP drafts are both a lot of pages. Yet,
   compared to the rest of the IPsec drafts, they seem to be
   progressing really well
- -Angelos

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface

iQCVAwUBM6GbCL0pBjh2h1kFAQGSkQP/YPFIh1YWP2OtnGspTj5Ti/iuSkLIvXod
E6YG31rMr0QJxv75E0S7h+dy0fpQHJCRSjAO4jeiwZz0pN+a7pcOekWo2Cz7/wg+
FeEGkvVg6cNoPfiXjDVlxIPIT2n1cORrAcR+fHBNUoKeTlIcpgElaqrhDlDBbv9s
gkFgTEZMh64=
=/NZH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---

References:

• Re: users and connections definitions
• From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>

---

• Prev by Date: Re: users and connections definitions
• Next by Date: RE: ISAKMP Oakley resolution and ipsec doi document questions
• Prev by thread: Re: users and connections definitions
• Next by thread: Re: users and connections definitions
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread