[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: users and connections definitions
> From: Stephen Kent <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> For someone who purports to like well-defined (and presumably well-written)
> RFCs, the long series of Photuris I-Ds hardly serve as examplars.
Although this comment is insufficiently specific to make any sort of
rebuttal, I will agree that once Photuris was gone from the WG, and we
could safely remove all the cryptologic rationale (demanded by the
"serious" but non-implementing "analysts") into a separate draft, it is
a _lot_ more readable for real implementors.
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
Key fingerprint = 2E 07 23 03 C5 62 70 D3 59 B1 4F 5E 1D C2 C1 A2