[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: What price security?

To: Phil Karn <karn@Qualcomm.com>, dpkemp@missi.ncsc.mil
Subject: Re: What price security?
From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm3@chrysler.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 1997 14:36:31 -0400
Cc: ipsec@tis.com
In-Reply-To: <199706201623.JAA20501@servo.qualcomm.com>
References: <199706201328.JAA17227@argon.ncsc.mil>
Reply-To: rgm3@chrysler.com
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com

At 09:23 AM 6/20/97 -0700, Phil Karn wrote:
>>Nonetheless, there are applications (such as gigabit routers) where the
>>processor-to-bandwidth ratio is smaller than pentium-over-modem.
>
>Which, IMHO, is yet another compelling argument for doing encryption
>on an end-to-end basis whenever possible.

And those servers better gear up for some hefty crypto work!


Robert Moskowitz
Chrysler Corporation
(810) 758-8212

Follow-Ups:

Re: What price security?

From: andrade@netcom.com (Andrade Software Andrade Networking)

References:

Re: What price security?

From: dpkemp@missi.ncsc.mil (David P. Kemp)

Re: What price security?

From: Phil Karn <karn@Qualcomm.com>

Prev by Date: Re: ISAKMP encryption choices?
Next by Date: Re: A little social engineering
Next by thread: Re: New draft -- IPSEC AH
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread