[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ISAKMP encryption choices?

To: "C. Harald Koch" <chk@utcc.utoronto.ca>, "Todd D. Ellner" <tellner@cs.pdx.edu>
Subject: Re: ISAKMP encryption choices?
From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm3@chrysler.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 1997 01:37:00 -0400
Cc: ipsec@tis.com
In-Reply-To: <97Jun20.150632edt.11650@janus.tor.securecomputing.com>
References: <tellner's message of "Fri, 20 Jun 1997 14:35:20 -0400". <199706201835.LAA03809@sirius.cs.pdx.edu><199706201835.LAA03809@sirius.cs.pdx.edu>
Reply-To: rgm3@chrysler.com
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com

At 03:10 PM 6/20/97 -0400, C. Harald Koch wrote:
>In message <199706201835.LAA03809@sirius.cs.pdx.edu>, "Todd D. Ellner"
writes:
>> Given the recent events in the Senate this entire discussion
>> may soon become moot. The Kerrey/McCain bill (SB909) has
>> REPLACED ProCODE as of last night. Mandated weak encryption,
>> warrantless key recovery, only government approved algorithms,
>> the whole nine yards.
>
>I don't know why we keep having to say this, but:
>
>SOME OF US ARE OUTSIDE THE USA.
>
>That means we can develop products (and standards!) with strong crypto, and
>without key recovery, despite the foolish decisions of your politicians.
>
And to which countries have you been able to ship a 3DES product?


Robert Moskowitz
Chrysler Corporation
(810) 758-8212

References:

Re: ISAKMP encryption choices?

From: "Todd D. Ellner" <tellner@cs.pdx.edu>

Re: ISAKMP encryption choices?

From: "C. Harald Koch" <chk@utcc.utoronto.ca>

Prev by Date: Re: Time value and 56-bit DES [Re: CAST5-128 was: A little socialengineering]
Next by Date: RE: A little social engineering
Prev by thread: Re: ISAKMP encryption choices?
Next by thread: RE: ISAKMP encryption choices?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread