[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SPI orthogonality

To: "Angelos D. Keromytis" <angelos@dsl.cis.upenn.edu>
Subject: Re: SPI orthogonality
From: Rodney Thayer <rodney@sabletech.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 1997 16:09:00 -0400
Cc: ipsec@tis.com
In-Reply-To: <199707091846.OAA00256@coredump.cis.upenn.edu>
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

It was defined in the most recent Architecture draft.  Page 6 of draft
ietf-ipsec-arch-sec-01.txt.  If you don't have a copy (it flushed out
of the draft sites about three weeks ago) I'll post a URL.  I believe
a new one is on it's way.

At 02:46 PM 7/9/97 EDT, you wrote:
>I believe this has not been answered (not "officially" anyway): are
>the SPI-spaces for AH and ESP orthogonal or not ? Meaning: are the
SAs
>identified by tuples (SPI/Remote Address) or by (SPI/Remote
>Address/Protocol), where Protocol = {AH, ESP} ?
>- -Angelos

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM8Pv0MKmlvJNktGxAQEbgAQAqygmPg/ymOyqMsvtcQJp3IcoP1U3NKto
HQcqcTkwHkPkDZ565QyCF6ktzx9+iOLvD2uooEQKc0aEiGvh/pknEyoU5NHtgNLb
6uHYzjgZeJ/2hc2yJXbmwNyDtH0Jx9TDmLN9kSunFW2cvD+aAz2Ul4oJD9Zw4UI5
3EiHAjv9eXU=
=CH2u
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:

SPI orthogonality

From: "Angelos D. Keromytis" <angelos@dsl.cis.upenn.edu>

Prev by Date: SPI orthogonality
Next by Date: Re: SPI orthogonality
Prev by thread: Re: SPI orthogonality
Next by thread: Re: SPI orthogonality
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread